tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10328789.post8673836763940441985..comments2023-04-04T04:06:41.971-04:00Comments on Respondeo dicendum: A foolish "philosopher" in need of reproof*brendonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10074867504254411465noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10328789.post-37936330168589041072008-04-20T17:56:00.000-04:002008-04-20T17:56:00.000-04:00Wow -- that is one ignorant professor. If he were ...Wow -- that is one ignorant professor. If he were part-time faculty in my department, I'd chew him out good. If he did it again, I'd fire him.Timhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15786874834919065011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10328789.post-69520263811258798662008-04-18T18:44:00.000-04:002008-04-18T18:44:00.000-04:00Excellent discussion. I was somewhat floored mysel...Excellent discussion. I was somewhat floored myself by the obvious equivocation in the response to Gina's claim about knowing the material without believing it.Brandonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06698839146562734910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10328789.post-36880988123558293692008-04-17T21:13:00.000-04:002008-04-17T21:13:00.000-04:00Thanks, Peter.I've used numbered footnotes before....Thanks, Peter.<BR/><BR/>I've used numbered footnotes before. It's a good thing to do when there get to be more than one or two. But I wrote this over a three or four hour period and I simply didn't expect there to be so many notes. And when I was finished I didn't feel like going back and changing them. So the lack of numbers here is laziness, pure and simple. Which probably isn't a good thing, brendonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10074867504254411465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10328789.post-50250342304227794322008-04-17T19:39:00.000-04:002008-04-17T19:39:00.000-04:00Great response.Have you ever thought of numbering ...Great response.<BR/><BR/>Have you ever thought of numbering your footnotes rather than use more and more asterisks? Just a thought. :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com